OLTA Finance
All indices
EB5
OETFB5 · Equities

Broad Equity ETFs 5

T1LiveKYCS 0.78
Reference net asset value
535.00usd

Calibrated launch value from the rulebook. This basket carries no order panel today.

Family
Equities
Risk profile
Conservative
Holdings
5
Weighting
Liquidity adjusted
Rebalance
Not published
Sharpe grade
0.78
The thesis

Why this basket exists

What the construction is trying to capture, who it is built for, and how it is meant to be sized inside a wider allocation.

Passive ownership of global equities, tokenized. SPY and IVV both track the S&P 500 from different issuers, giving built-in tracking-variance diversification. QQQ adds NASDAQ-100 concentration. IEMG and EEM both track MSCI Emerging Markets across issuers. The simplest way to express 'I want the equity market' inside an on-chain portfolio.

  • Equities family · Conservative risk tier
  • Rule-based, divisor-method NAV

No committee note is published for this basket yet. The text above is its catalogue description; the framing beside it is derived from the mandate and the risk tier.

How it is meant to be used
Built forAllocators with strict drawdown caps and Tier 1 mandates.
Typical sizing30 to 60% of a crypto sleeve
Weighting ruleLiquidity adjusted
Risk tierConservative
Composition

5 holdings, drawn to scale

Each tile's area is its weight in the basket, so the picture and the table below it are the same data read two ways.

Weight by area
5 holdings
SPYon · 32% of the basketSPYon32%QQQon · 28% of the basketQQQon28%IEMGon · 18% of the basketIEMGon18%EEMon · 12% of the basketEEMon12%IVVon · 10% of the basketIVVon10%
Largest holding
SPYon 32.0%
The single name that moves net asset value most.
Top three
78.0%
Share of the basket held by its three largest names.
Effective holdings
4.21
Equal weight equivalent of 5 named positions.
Published weights
largest first
Published weights for all 5 holdings, largest first.
HoldingShareWeight
01SPYon32%
02QQQon28%
03IEMGon18%
04EEMon12%
05IVVon10%
Total100%
Holdings

Why each name earned its seat

Research notes per constituent: the case for the asset, the regime that suits it, and the risk the seat carries.

  • SPYon32%Core anchor

    SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust is the largest US equity ETF and the canonical broad-market index.

    Performs in broad-equity-up regimes. Sensitive to sector concentration in Mag 7 names that drives a non-trivial share of the index.

    Mag 7 concentration
  • QQQon28%Growth

    Invesco QQQ Trust tracks the NASDAQ-100 and provides high-growth tech-concentrated exposure.

    Performs in tech-up and AI-narrative phases. Higher drawdown than SPY in rate-up or quality-rotation regimes.

    tech concentration
  • IEMGon18%Growth

    iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF tracks the broad emerging-markets index. The EM diversification leg.

    Performs in dollar-down and EM-flow-in regimes. Underperforms in flight-to-quality and dollar-strength phases.

    China-weight exposuredollar-cycle sensitivity
  • EEMon12%Growth

    Research note pending for this holding. Its weight and its role in the mandate are published above.

  • IVVon10%Growth

    Research note pending for this holding. Its weight and its role in the mandate are published above.

The record

What the numbers say

Simulated on historical constituent prices. A Sharpe is only published once the measured window clears 90 days, and drawdowns keep their sign.

Backtested record
1826 day window
Sharpe grade
0.78Solid
Measured over 1826 days against a bitcoin reference of 0.33.
Total return
+71.6%
Across the full window, simulated.
Max drawdown
−29.8%
Deepest peak to trough. 332 days to recover.
Annualised volatility
14.6%
Standard deviation of daily returns, annualised.
Beta vs bitcoin
0.12
Correlation 0.38.
Effective holdings
4.21
Of 5 named. Equal weight equivalent, from the published weights.
Simulated rebalance
Quarterly
Backtest assumption, not a published cadence.
Jensen alpha
+6.2%
Excess over what beta to bitcoin alone explains.
R squared
0.14
Share of the basket's moves bitcoin explains.
Bitcoin reference · Sharpe 0.33 · max drawdown −76.6%
OCBE100 reference · Sharpe 0.34 · max drawdown −61.1%

Every figure above is simulated on historical constituent prices for a basket that has not traded. It describes how the rules would have behaved, not how they will behave. OETFB5 is part of a public preview.

Loss tail
95% VaR · loss tailhistorical
1-week · 7d−3%
1-month · 30d−7%

Max expected loss over the horizon · 95% confidence · historical distribution. There is a 5% chance the actual loss is larger.

Across timeframes
vs bitcoin
Simulated return for this basket over five windows, with a Sharpe and a comparison with bitcoin wherever the window is long enough to publish one.
WindowReturnSharpevs BTC
Full window+71.6%0.78+0.43
1 year+35.1%2.97+3.80
6 months+14.3%2.35+3.03
3 months+9.4%Not graded·

Returns are simulated over each window. A Sharpe is published only once that window clears 90 days, so the shorter rows read Not graded and carry no comparison with bitcoin. Short windows flatter and punish at random; read the full window first and treat the rest as texture.

Risk

What could go wrong

Priced off this basket's own weights rather than off a generic disclaimer, so every figure below can be checked against the table above.

Drawdowns are bounded relative to the broader crypto market. Constituent caps and liquidity filters contain concentration risk. Full risk parameters live in the methodology rulebook.

Structural flags
3 on this basket
  • Single-name concentrationMedium

    SPYon carries 32% of the basket. A drawdown in this single name materially moves NAV.

  • Short price historyHigh

    SPYon, QQQon, IEMGon and 2 more have under a year of usable history. Backtest metrics carry wider error bars.

  • Routing dependenceMedium

    Routes through Dinari (stocks) and Backed Finance (ETFs). Settles on the EVM rail. KYC at the OLTA layer, not available in the US today.

If it goes wrong
effect on net asset value
4 downside scenarios for this basket, and the loss each one would put on net asset value.
ScenarioLoss on net asset value
SPYon loses half its valueLargest holding, 32.0% of the basket−16.0%Mechanical
The three largest holdings fall 30%SPYon, QQQon, IEMGon · 78.0% of the basket together−23.4%Mechanical
The deepest simulated fall repeatsRecorded once in the window, 332 days to recover−29.8%Recorded
A bad month, one in twenty95% historical value at risk over 30 days−7.3%Measured

The mechanical rows hold every other holding still, which is the optimistic case. This basket measured 0.38 correlation to bitcoin over its window, which is loose enough that the holdings can move apart. Even so, a shock rarely lands on one name alone. Read the figures as a floor on the damage, never a ceiling.

Further reading

The research behind the construction

Tokenized equity execution is not open yet

Single stocks route through Dinari and ETF coverage through Backed Finance, settling on the EVM rail once identity checks clear. The execution surface for this family arrives with the next release. Composition, weights and the measured record above are current.