OLTA Finance
All indices
TC5
OTC5 · Real world assets

Tokenized Commodities 5

T1Under studyCycle-tested
Reference net asset value
3,450.00usd

Calibrated launch value from the rulebook. This basket carries no order panel today.

Family
Real world assets
Risk profile
Conservative
Holdings
5
Weighting
Liquidity adjusted
Rebalance
Not published
Sharpe grade
Track too short
The thesis

Why this basket exists

What the construction is trying to capture, who it is built for, and how it is meant to be sized inside a wider allocation.

Five tokens with direct or indirect commodity exposure. PAXG and XAUT for physical gold provide about 63% of the basket. ONDO and CFG add RWA infrastructure beta, POLYX rounds out the security-token rails. A hybrid commodity-plus-infrastructure construction.

  • RWA family · Conservative risk tier
  • Rule-based, divisor-method NAV

No committee note is published for this basket yet. The text above is its catalogue description; the framing beside it is derived from the mandate and the risk tier.

How it is meant to be used
Built forAllocators with strict drawdown caps and Tier 1 mandates.
Typical sizing30 to 60% of a crypto sleeve
Weighting ruleLiquidity adjusted
Risk tierConservative
Composition

5 holdings, drawn to scale

Each tile's area is its weight in the basket, so the picture and the table below it are the same data read two ways.

Weight by area
5 holdings
PAXG · 35% of the basketPAXG35%XAUT · 28% of the basketXAUT28%ONDO · 18% of the basketONDO18%CFG · 12% of the basketCFG12%POLYX · 7% of the basketPOLYX7%
Largest holding
PAXG 35.0%
The single name that moves net asset value most.
Top three
81.0%
Share of the basket held by its three largest names.
Effective holdings
3.96
Equal weight equivalent of 5 named positions.
Published weights
largest first
Published weights for all 5 holdings, largest first.
HoldingShareWeight
01PAXG35%
02XAUT28%
03ONDO18%
04CFG12%
05POLYX7%
Total100%
Holdings

Why each name earned its seat

Research notes per constituent: the case for the asset, the regime that suits it, and the risk the seat carries.

  • PAXG35%Hedge

    PAX Gold is the largest tokenized physical gold asset on-chain. The cleanest macro-hedge expression in an on-chain portfolio.

    Performs in flight-to-quality, stagflation, and dollar-weakness regimes. Underperforms in pro-risk crypto cycles.

    custody concentration
  • XAUT28%Hedge

    Tether Gold is the second-largest tokenized physical gold asset. Pairing with PAXG reduces single-issuer concentration in the on-chain gold sleeve.

    Tracks PAXG closely. The marginal correlation difference is operational rather than market-driven.

    issuer concentrationTether disclosure
  • ONDO18%Yield

    Ondo Finance is the largest tokenized treasury issuer and a category-defining brand in the RWA stack.

    Performs in RWA-narrative phases and high-rate regimes. Underperforms in pure-crypto altcoin cycles and if rate cuts compress treasury yields.

    regulatory uncertaintyrate-cycle sensitivity
  • CFG12%Yield

    Centrifuge tokenizes private credit and trade finance on-chain. The cleanest pure-play on tokenized credit at scale.

    Performs in credit-spread-widening regimes. Underperforms when capital prefers larger-cap RWA exposure.

    lower liquiditycredit-default exposure
  • POLYX7%Infrastructure

    Polymesh is the regulated security-token L1 with identity, accreditation, and transfer restrictions native to the protocol.

    Performs in regulated-issuance phases. Sensitive to regulatory clarity around security tokens.

    thin liquidityregulation dependence
The record

What the numbers say

Simulated on historical constituent prices. A Sharpe is only published once the measured window clears 90 days, and drawdowns keep their sign.

Backtested record
61 day window
Sharpe grade
Track too short
A grade is published once the window reaches 90 days. This one covers 61.
Total return
+28.7%
Across the full window, simulated.
Max drawdown
−9.9%
Deepest peak to trough. 9 days to recover.
Annualised volatility
36.6%
Standard deviation of daily returns, annualised.
Beta vs bitcoin
0.68
Correlation 0.51.
Effective holdings
3.96
Of 5 named. Equal weight equivalent, from the published weights.
Simulated rebalance
Quarterly
Backtest assumption, not a published cadence.
Jensen alpha
+72.4%
Excess over what beta to bitcoin alone explains.
R squared
0.26
Share of the basket's moves bitcoin explains.
Bitcoin reference · Sharpe 0.33 · max drawdown −76.6%
OCBE100 reference · Sharpe 0.34 · max drawdown −61.1%

Every figure above is simulated on historical constituent prices for a basket that has not traded. It describes how the rules would have behaved, not how they will behave. OTC5 is part of a public preview.

Loss tail
95% VaR · loss tailhistorical
1-week · 7d−8%
1-month · 30d0%

Max expected loss over the horizon · 95% confidence · historical distribution. There is a 5% chance the actual loss is larger.

Across timeframes
vs bitcoin
Simulated return for this basket over five windows, with a Sharpe and a comparison with bitcoin wherever the window is long enough to publish one.
WindowReturnSharpevs BTC
Full window+28.7%Not graded·
1 year+28.7%Not graded·
6 months+28.7%Not graded·
3 months+28.7%Not graded·
1 month+16.4%Not graded·

Returns are simulated over each window. A Sharpe is published only once that window clears 90 days, so the shorter rows read Not graded and carry no comparison with bitcoin. Short windows flatter and punish at random; read the full window first and treat the rest as texture.

Risk

What could go wrong

Priced off this basket's own weights rather than off a generic disclaimer, so every figure below can be checked against the table above.

Drawdowns are bounded relative to the broader crypto market. Constituent caps and liquidity filters contain concentration risk. Full risk parameters live in the methodology rulebook.

Structural flags
3 on this basket
  • Single-name concentrationMedium

    PAXG carries 35% of the basket. A drawdown in this single name materially moves NAV.

  • Short price historyMedium

    ONDO have under a year of usable history. Backtest metrics carry wider error bars.

  • Pre-live statusLow

    Second Wave index. NAV is computed but the basket isn't yet open for live allocation.

If it goes wrong
effect on net asset value
3 downside scenarios for this basket, and the loss each one would put on net asset value.
ScenarioLoss on net asset value
PAXG loses half its valueLargest holding, 35.0% of the basket−17.5%Mechanical
The three largest holdings fall 30%PAXG, XAUT, ONDO · 81.0% of the basket together−24.3%Mechanical
The deepest simulated fall repeatsRecorded once in the window, 9 days to recover−9.9%Recorded

The mechanical rows hold every other holding still, which is the optimistic case. This basket measured 0.51 correlation to bitcoin over its window: the holdings often move together, though less tightly than a broad crypto basket. Read the figures as a floor on the damage, never a ceiling.

Further reading

The research behind the construction

Worth a second look later

OTC5 is under methodology review, so it carries no buy action today. The weights and the cadence are still being settled, and publishing an order panel over rules that are about to change would be the wrong kind of confidence. Everything above stays on the page while the work runs: the composition, the measured record and the risk flags all move with the research.