OLTA Finance
All indices
ZK8
OZK8 · Sector

Zero-Knowledge 8

T2RetiredS −0.86
Reference net asset value
215.75usd

Calibrated launch value from the rulebook. This basket carries no order panel today.

Family
Sector
Risk profile
Growth
Holdings
8
Weighting
Liquidity adjusted
Rebalance
Not published
Sharpe grade
−0.86
The thesis

Why this basket exists

What the construction is trying to capture, who it is built for, and how it is meant to be sized inside a wider allocation.

Eight zero-knowledge protocols. MINA, ZK, STRK and POL anchor; MANTA, DUSK, SCRT and ALT cover privacy-adjacent constructions. Designed for thematic conviction that ZK-rollups absorb both scaling and privacy demand as the underlying tech matures. BTC-correlated by design; diversification benefit is intra-sector.

  • Sector family · Growth risk tier
  • Rule-based, divisor-method NAV

No committee note is published for this basket yet. The text above is its catalogue description; the framing beside it is derived from the mandate and the risk tier.

How it is meant to be used
Built forAllocators who can tolerate 40 to 60% drawdowns for a longer payoff window.
Typical sizing5 to 15% of a crypto sleeve
Weighting ruleLiquidity adjusted
Risk tierGrowth
Composition

8 holdings, drawn to scale

Each tile's area is its weight in the basket, so the picture and the table below it are the same data read two ways.

Weight by area
8 holdings
MINA · 18% of the basketMINA18%ZK · 17% of the basketZK17%STRK · 16% of the basketSTRK16%POL · 13% of the basketPOL13%MANTA · 10% of the basketMANTA10%DUSK · 9% of the basketDUSK9%SCRT · 9% of the basketSCRT9%ALT · 8% of the basketALT8%
Largest holding
MINA 18.0%
The single name that moves net asset value most.
Top three
51.0%
Share of the basket held by its three largest names.
Effective holdings
7.33
Equal weight equivalent of 8 named positions.
Published weights
largest first
Published weights for all 8 holdings, largest first.
HoldingShareWeight
01MINA18%
02ZK17%
03STRK16%
04POL13%
05MANTA10%
06DUSK9%
07SCRT9%
08ALT8%
Total100%
Holdings

Why each name earned its seat

Research notes per constituent: the case for the asset, the regime that suits it, and the risk the seat carries.

  • MINA18%Growth

    Research note pending for this holding. Its weight and its role in the mandate are published above.

  • ZK17%Growth

    Research note pending for this holding. Its weight and its role in the mandate are published above.

  • STRK16%Growth

    Research note pending for this holding. Its weight and its role in the mandate are published above.

  • POL13%Growth

    Research note pending for this holding. Its weight and its role in the mandate are published above.

  • MANTA10%Growth

    Research note pending for this holding. Its weight and its role in the mandate are published above.

Show the remaining 3 holdings
  • DUSK9%Infrastructure

    Dusk Network is the privacy-focused security-token L1 targeting EU regulated issuance with ZK primitives at the protocol layer.

    Performs in regulatory-tailwind cycles and privacy or ZK narrative phases.

    thin liquiditynarrow market
  • SCRT9%Growth

    Research note pending for this holding. Its weight and its role in the mandate are published above.

  • ALT8%Growth

    Research note pending for this holding. Its weight and its role in the mandate are published above.

The record

What the numbers say

Simulated on historical constituent prices. A Sharpe is only published once the measured window clears 90 days, and drawdowns keep their sign.

Backtested record
708 day window
Sharpe grade
−0.86Negative
Measured over 708 days against a bitcoin reference of 0.33.
Total return
−88.0%
Across the full window, simulated.
Max drawdown
−91.6%
Deepest peak to trough. 457 days to recover.
Annualised volatility
77.8%
Standard deviation of daily returns, annualised.
Beta vs bitcoin
1.38
Correlation 0.68.
Effective holdings
7.33
Of 8 named. Equal weight equivalent, from the published weights.
Simulated rebalance
Quarterly
Backtest assumption, not a published cadence.
Jensen alpha
−83.0%
Excess over what beta to bitcoin alone explains.
R squared
0.47
Share of the basket's moves bitcoin explains.
Bitcoin reference · Sharpe 0.33 · max drawdown −76.6%
OCBE100 reference · Sharpe 0.34 · max drawdown −61.1%

Every figure above is simulated on historical constituent prices for a basket that has not traded. It describes how the rules would have behaved, not how they will behave. OZK8 is part of a public preview.

Loss tail
95% VaR · loss tailhistorical
1-week · 7d−20%
1-month · 30d−35%

Max expected loss over the horizon · 95% confidence · historical distribution. There is a 5% chance the actual loss is larger.

Across timeframes
vs bitcoin
Simulated return for this basket over five windows, with a Sharpe and a comparison with bitcoin wherever the window is long enough to publish one.
WindowReturnSharpevs BTC
Full window−88.0%−0.86−1.07
1 year−62.7%−0.84−0.01
6 months−38.6%−1.08−0.40
3 months+0.5%0.05−3.36
1 month−2.9%Not graded·

Returns are simulated over each window. A Sharpe is published only once that window clears 90 days, so the shorter rows read Not graded and carry no comparison with bitcoin. Short windows flatter and punish at random; read the full window first and treat the rest as texture.

Risk

What could go wrong

Priced off this basket's own weights rather than off a generic disclaimer, so every figure below can be checked against the table above.

Higher beta than the broad market. Drawdowns of 40 to 60% during risk-off regimes are within historical range. Size accordingly.

Structural flags
3 on this basket
  • Elevated volatilityMedium

    Backtest annualised vol 78%. See the backtest panel above for the full risk numbers.

  • Deep historical drawdownHigh

    Max drawdown reached −92% in the backtest window. Size accordingly.

  • Pre-live statusLow

    Second Wave index. NAV is computed but the basket isn't yet open for live allocation.

If it goes wrong
effect on net asset value
4 downside scenarios for this basket, and the loss each one would put on net asset value.
ScenarioLoss on net asset value
MINA loses half its valueLargest holding, 18.0% of the basket−9.0%Mechanical
The three largest holdings fall 30%MINA, ZK, STRK · 51.0% of the basket together−15.3%Mechanical
The deepest simulated fall repeatsRecorded once in the window, 457 days to recover−91.6%Recorded
A bad month, one in twenty95% historical value at risk over 30 days−35.2%Measured

The mechanical rows hold every other holding still, which is the optimistic case. This basket measured 0.68 correlation to bitcoin over its window: the holdings often move together, though less tightly than a broad crypto basket. Read the figures as a floor on the damage, never a ceiling.

Further reading

The research behind the construction

This strategy has been shelved

The ZK narrative was defeated across the test window. Basket drew down 91.6% from peak with no constituent recovering above 35% of its prior high. The privacy-plus-scaling thesis did not survive the consolidation of demand into L2 rollups that ship ZK as infrastructure rather than as a token category.

Retired 2026-05-24