OLTA Finance
All indices
SW7
OSTW7 · Stellar

OLTA Stellar RWA 7

T1Under study
Reference net asset value
1,000.00usd

Calibrated launch value from the rulebook. This basket carries no order panel today.

Family
Stellar
Risk profile
Conservative
Holdings
7
Weighting
IssuerCapped25
Rebalance
Monthly
Sharpe grade
−0.07
Composition

7 holdings, drawn to scale

Each tile's area is its weight in the basket, so the picture and the table below it are the same data read two ways.

Weight by area
7 holdings
XLM · 25% of the basketXLM25%BENJI · 24.3% of the basketBENJI24.3%USDY · 16.2% of the basketUSDY16.2%USTBL · 12.2% of the basketUSTBL12.2%EUTBL · 8.1% of the basketEUTBL8.1%SHX · 8.1% of the basketSHX8.1%VELO · 6.1% of the basketVELO6.1%
Largest holding
XLM 25.0%
The single name that moves net asset value most.
Top three
65.5%
Share of the basket held by its three largest names.
Effective holdings
5.57
Equal weight equivalent of 7 named positions.
Published weights
largest first
Published weights for all 7 holdings, largest first.
HoldingShareWeight
01XLM25%
02BENJI24.3%
03USDY16.2%
04USTBL12.2%
05EUTBL8.1%
06SHX8.1%
07VELO6.1%
Total100.0%
Risk

What could go wrong

Priced off this basket's own weights rather than off a generic disclaimer, so every figure below can be checked against the table above.

Drawdowns are bounded relative to the broader crypto market. Constituent caps and liquidity filters contain concentration risk. Full risk parameters live in the methodology rulebook.

Structural flags
4 on this basket
  • Top-name weightLow

    XLM is the largest position at 25%. Capped by methodology but still drives index direction.

  • Elevated volatilityMedium

    Backtest annualised vol 81%. See the backtest panel above for the full risk numbers.

  • Deep historical drawdownHigh

    Max drawdown reached −90% in the backtest window. Size accordingly.

  • Pre-live statusLow

    Preview index. NAV is computed but the basket isn't yet open for live allocation.

If it goes wrong
effect on net asset value
3 downside scenarios for this basket, and the loss each one would put on net asset value.
ScenarioLoss on net asset value
XLM loses half its valueLargest holding, 25.0% of the basket−12.5%Mechanical
The three largest holdings fall 30%XLM, BENJI, USDY · 65.5% of the basket together−19.7%Mechanical
The deepest simulated fall repeatsRecorded once in the window, 596 days to recover−90.5%Recorded

The mechanical rows hold every other holding still, which is the optimistic case. This basket measured 0.64 correlation to bitcoin over its window: the holdings often move together, though less tightly than a broad crypto basket. Read the figures as a floor on the damage, never a ceiling.

Further reading

The research behind the construction

Worth a second look later

OSTW7 is under methodology review, so it carries no buy action today. The weights and the cadence are still being settled, and an order panel over rules that are about to move would put a commitment on the page the research has not earned. Everything above stays visible and updates with the study, so you can follow the work as it lands.