OLTA Finance
All indices
SN6
OSTN6 · Stellar

OLTA Stellar Native 6

T3Under study
Reference net asset value
1,000.00usd

Calibrated launch value from the rulebook. This basket carries no order panel today.

Family
Stellar
Risk profile
Speculative
Holdings
6
Weighting
MarketCapCapped42
Rebalance
Quarterly
Sharpe grade
Not graded
The thesis

Why this basket exists

What the construction is trying to capture, who it is built for, and how it is meant to be sized inside a wider allocation.

The Stellar native growth basket · XLM capped at 42% with the network's payments and DeFi rails (SHX, VELO, AQUA) and a thin tokenized-treasury ballast. Concentrated native exposure for conviction on Stellar itself · deliberately not a diversified index, the tradeable native set is small. Under study while the settlement rail is designed.

  • Stellar family · Speculative risk tier
  • Rule-based, divisor-method NAV

No committee note is published for this basket yet. The text above is its catalogue description; the framing beside it is derived from the mandate and the risk tier.

How it is meant to be used
Built forGeneralist crypto allocators with a multi-quarter horizon.
Typical sizing20 to 40% of a crypto sleeve
Weighting ruleMarketCapCapped42
Risk tierSpeculative
Composition

6 holdings, drawn to scale

Each tile's area is its weight in the basket, so the picture and the table below it are the same data read two ways.

Weight by area
6 holdings
XLM · 42% of the basketXLM42%SHX · 18% of the basketSHX18%VELO · 16% of the basketVELO16%AQUA · 14% of the basketAQUA14%USDY · 6% of the basketUSDY6%BENJI · 4% of the basketBENJI4%
Largest holding
XLM 42.0%
The single name that moves net asset value most.
Top three
76.0%
Share of the basket held by its three largest names.
Effective holdings
3.86
Equal weight equivalent of 6 named positions.
Published weights
largest first
Published weights for all 6 holdings, largest first.
HoldingShareWeight
01XLM42%
02SHX18%
03VELO16%
04AQUA14%
05USDY6%
06BENJI4%
Total100%
Holdings

Why each name earned its seat

Research notes per constituent: the case for the asset, the regime that suits it, and the risk the seat carries.

  • XLM42%Infrastructure

    Stellar is the longest-running tokenized-payments network and the rails for the Franklin Templeton on-chain money-market fund.

    Performs in payments and tokenized-treasury narrative phases. Underperforms in DeFi or smart-contract-led cycles.

    narrow product surface
  • SHX18%Growth

    Research note pending for this holding. Its weight and its role in the mandate are published above.

  • VELO16%Growth

    Research note pending for this holding. Its weight and its role in the mandate are published above.

  • AQUA14%Growth

    Research note pending for this holding. Its weight and its role in the mandate are published above.

  • USDY6%Growth

    Research note pending for this holding. Its weight and its role in the mandate are published above.

  • BENJI4%Growth

    Research note pending for this holding. Its weight and its role in the mandate are published above.

The record

What the numbers say

Simulated on historical constituent prices. A Sharpe is only published once the measured window clears 90 days, and drawdowns keep their sign.

Backtested record

No backtest is on record for this basket. The methodology asks for at least 90 days of usable constituent history before a record is published, and this composition does not clear it yet.

Risk

What could go wrong

Priced off this basket's own weights rather than off a generic disclaimer, so every figure below can be checked against the table above.

Drawdowns of 30 to 50% are within historical range during cycle bottoms, tracking the broader crypto market. Family-standard caps and rebalancing rules apply.

Structural flags
2 on this basket
  • Single-name concentrationHigh

    XLM carries 42% of the basket. A drawdown in this single name materially moves NAV.

  • Pre-live statusLow

    Preview index. NAV is computed but the basket isn't yet open for live allocation.

If it goes wrong
effect on net asset value
2 downside scenarios for this basket, and the loss each one would put on net asset value.
ScenarioLoss on net asset value
XLM loses half its valueLargest holding, 42.0% of the basket−21.0%Mechanical
The three largest holdings fall 30%XLM, SHX, VELO · 76.0% of the basket together−22.8%Mechanical

The mechanical rows hold every other holding still, which is the optimistic case. In practice these holdings tend to move together rather than one at a time. Read the figures as a floor on the damage, never a ceiling.

Further reading

The research behind the construction

Worth a second look later

OSTN6 is under methodology review, so it carries no buy action today. The weights and the cadence are still being settled, and publishing an order panel over rules that are about to change would be the wrong kind of confidence. Everything above stays on the page while the work runs: the composition, the measured record and the risk flags all move with the research.