OLTA Finance
All indices
SP6
OSHARP6 · Diversified

Sharpe Max 6

T1LiveKYCS 1.54Cycle-tested
Reference net asset value
200.00usd

Calibrated launch value from the rulebook. The live reading, the chart and the order panel sit on the desk.

Buy OSHARP6
Family
Diversified
Risk profile
Moderate
Holdings
6
Weighting
HierarchicalRiskParity
Rebalance
Quarterly
Sharpe grade
1.54
The thesis

Why this basket exists

What the construction is trying to capture, who it is built for, and how it is meant to be sized inside a wider allocation.

Hand-picked from the highest-Sharpe assets in our 2-year backtest: NVIDIA (the largest contributor to the Semis 7 index's 2.30 Sharpe), Broadcom, Eli Lilly, gold, and a BTC/ETH crypto sleeve. Backtested Sharpe 1.54 over 729 days vs BTC's 0.15 in the same window. Total return +84.6%, max drawdown -24.6%, correlation to BTC -0.07. The Sharpe-maximised expression of cross-asset construction.

  • Diversified family · Moderate risk tier
  • Rule-based, divisor-method NAV

No committee note is published for this basket yet. The text above is its catalogue description; the framing beside it is derived from the mandate and the risk tier.

How it is meant to be used
Built forGeneralist crypto allocators with a multi-quarter horizon.
Typical sizing20 to 40% of a crypto sleeve
Weighting ruleHierarchicalRiskParity
Risk tierModerate
Composition

6 holdings, drawn to scale

Each tile's area is its weight in the basket, so the picture and the table below it are the same data read two ways.

Weight by area
6 holdings
NVDAon · 25% of the basketNVDAon25%GLDon · 20% of the basketGLDon20%AVGOon · 15% of the basketAVGOon15%LLYon · 15% of the basketLLYon15%BTC · 13% of the basketBTC13%ETH · 12% of the basketETH12%
Largest holding
NVDAon 25.0%
The single name that moves net asset value most.
Top three
60.0%
Share of the basket held by its three largest names.
Effective holdings
5.59
Equal weight equivalent of 6 named positions.
Published weights
largest first
Published weights for all 6 holdings, largest first.
HoldingShareWeight
01NVDAon25%
02GLDon20%
03AVGOon15%
04LLYon15%
05BTC13%
06ETH12%
Total100%
Holdings

Why each name earned its seat

Research notes per constituent: the case for the asset, the regime that suits it, and the risk the seat carries.

  • NVDAon25%Core anchor

    NVIDIA is the single largest contributor to risk-adjusted returns in the equity universe over the 2-year backtest window. Designs the GPUs that train every frontier model.

    Performs in AI-capex-up regimes. Sensitive to hyperscaler demand-softening signals and to China-export-control news.

    valuation extensionChina export-control exposure
  • GLDon20%Hedge

    SPDR Gold Shares is the largest gold ETF and the cleanest tokenized expression of an institutional gold position.

    Performs in flight-to-quality, inflation-up, and dollar-weakness or central-bank-buying cycles.

    correlation dilution if duration sells off
  • AVGOon15%Core anchor

    Broadcom is the second-largest US chip franchise by market cap and the dominant custom-ASIC vendor for hyperscaler workloads.

    Performs in AI-capex cycles and hyperscaler ASIC ramps. Sensitive to VMware-integration noise and enterprise-software cycle softness.

    VMware integration risk
  • LLYon15%Hedge

    Eli Lilly is the GLP-1 obesity-drug leader and the single most valuable pharma franchise by market cap.

    Performs in defensive rotation and obesity-narrative cycles. Lower correlation to tech and crypto beta.

    GLP-1 competitive pressure
  • BTC13%Core anchor

    Bitcoin is the only crypto asset that clears the institutional bar on every dimension: deepest order books, longest track record, lowest custody friction.

    Strongest in flight-to-quality and pro-risk macro phases when liquidity is abundant. Underperforms in altcoin rotations and AI-narrative cycles.

    concentration risk
  • ETH12%Core anchor

    Ethereum is the only smart-contract platform with the TVL, developer mindshare, and settlement depth to count as core infrastructure.

    Outperforms BTC in DeFi cycles and L2 adoption waves. Lags when narratives shift to alt-L1s or when L2 fragmentation eats into mainnet fee capture.

    fee-revenue regime risk
The record

What the numbers say

Simulated on historical constituent prices. A Sharpe is only published once the measured window clears 90 days, and drawdowns keep their sign.

Backtested record
729 day window
Sharpe grade
1.54Exceptional
Measured over 729 days against a bitcoin reference of 0.33.
Total return
+84.6%
Across the full window, simulated.
Max drawdown
−24.6%
Deepest peak to trough inside the window.
Annualised volatility
·
Standard deviation of daily returns, annualised.
Beta vs bitcoin
−0.05
Correlation −0.07.
Effective holdings
5.59
Of 6 named. Equal weight equivalent, from the published weights.
Simulated rebalance
Quarterly
Backtest assumption, not a published cadence.
Jensen alpha
·
Excess over what beta to bitcoin alone explains.
R squared
·
Share of the basket's moves bitcoin explains.
Bitcoin reference · Sharpe 0.33 · max drawdown −76.6%
OCBE100 reference · Sharpe 0.34 · max drawdown −61.1%

Every figure above is simulated on historical constituent prices for a basket that has not traded. It describes how the rules would have behaved, not how they will behave. OSHARP6 is part of a public preview.

Loss tail
95% VaR · loss tailhistorical
1-week · 7d−6%
1-month · 30d−11%

Max expected loss over the horizon · 95% confidence · historical distribution. There is a 5% chance the actual loss is larger.

Across timeframes
vs bitcoin
Simulated return for this basket over five windows, with a Sharpe and a comparison with bitcoin wherever the window is long enough to publish one.
WindowReturnSharpevs BTC
Full window+535.0%1.89+1.54
1 year+38.1%1.94+2.77
6 months+2.3%0.23+0.91
3 months+10.3%Not graded·

Returns are simulated over each window. A Sharpe is published only once that window clears 90 days, so the shorter rows read Not graded and carry no comparison with bitcoin. Short windows flatter and punish at random; read the full window first and treat the rest as texture.

Risk

What could go wrong

Priced off this basket's own weights rather than off a generic disclaimer, so every figure below can be checked against the table above.

Drawdowns of 30 to 50% are within historical range during cycle bottoms, tracking the broader crypto market. Family-standard caps and rebalancing rules apply.

Structural flags
3 on this basket
  • Top-name weightLow

    NVDAon is the largest position at 25%. Capped by methodology but still drives index direction.

  • Short price historyHigh

    NVDAon, AVGOon, LLYon and 1 more have under a year of usable history. Backtest metrics carry wider error bars.

  • Routing dependenceMedium

    Routes through Dinari (stocks) and Backed Finance (ETFs). Settles on the EVM rail. KYC at the OLTA layer, not available in the US today.

If it goes wrong
effect on net asset value
4 downside scenarios for this basket, and the loss each one would put on net asset value.
ScenarioLoss on net asset value
NVDAon loses half its valueLargest holding, 25.0% of the basket−12.5%Mechanical
The three largest holdings fall 30%NVDAon, GLDon, AVGOon · 60.0% of the basket together−18.0%Mechanical
The deepest simulated fall repeatsDeepest peak to trough in the measured window−24.6%Recorded
A bad month, one in twenty95% historical value at risk over 30 days−11.1%Measured

The mechanical rows hold every other holding still, which is the optimistic case. This basket measured −0.07 correlation to bitcoin over its window, which is loose enough that the holdings can move apart. Even so, a shock rarely lands on one name alone. Read the figures as a floor on the damage, never a ceiling.

Further reading

The research behind the construction

Take a position in OSHARP6

The desk carries the live net asset value, the chart and the order panel. Funds in this public preview are simulated, so an order here moves a simulated balance and settles nothing. The EVM settlement rail opens with mainnet in the first half of 2027.