OLTA Finance
All indices
PC5
OPC5 · Real world assets

Private Credit 5

T1Under studyCycle-tested
Reference net asset value
615.40usd

Calibrated launch value from the rulebook. This basket carries no order panel today.

Family
Real world assets
Risk profile
Moderate
Holdings
5
Weighting
Liquidity adjusted
Rebalance
Not published
Sharpe grade
Track too short
The thesis

Why this basket exists

What the construction is trying to capture, who it is built for, and how it is meant to be sized inside a wider allocation.

Five protocols tokenizing private credit and real-world lending. Centrifuge and Syrup (formerly Maple) lead with active credit deals. ONDO and MANTRA cover the infrastructure layer. SKY rounds out with USDS treasury yield. The fastest-growing RWA sub-category by deployed capital, with credit spreads above what allocators get from on-chain stables.

  • RWA family · Moderate risk tier
  • Rule-based, divisor-method NAV

No committee note is published for this basket yet. The text above is its catalogue description; the framing beside it is derived from the mandate and the risk tier.

How it is meant to be used
Built forGeneralist crypto allocators with a multi-quarter horizon.
Typical sizing20 to 40% of a crypto sleeve
Weighting ruleLiquidity adjusted
Risk tierModerate
Composition

5 holdings, drawn to scale

Each tile's area is its weight in the basket, so the picture and the table below it are the same data read two ways.

Weight by area
5 holdings
CFG · 30% of the basketCFG30%SYRUP · 28% of the basketSYRUP28%ONDO · 22% of the basketONDO22%MANTRA · 12% of the basketMANTRA12%SKY · 8% of the basketSKY8%
Largest holding
CFG 30.0%
The single name that moves net asset value most.
Top three
80.0%
Share of the basket held by its three largest names.
Effective holdings
4.21
Equal weight equivalent of 5 named positions.
Published weights
largest first
Published weights for all 5 holdings, largest first.
HoldingShareWeight
01CFG30%
02SYRUP28%
03ONDO22%
04MANTRA12%
05SKY8%
Total100%
Holdings

Why each name earned its seat

Research notes per constituent: the case for the asset, the regime that suits it, and the risk the seat carries.

  • CFG30%Yield

    Centrifuge tokenizes private credit and trade finance on-chain. The cleanest pure-play on tokenized credit at scale.

    Performs in credit-spread-widening regimes. Underperforms when capital prefers larger-cap RWA exposure.

    lower liquiditycredit-default exposure
  • SYRUP28%Growth

    Research note pending for this holding. Its weight and its role in the mandate are published above.

  • ONDO22%Yield

    Ondo Finance is the largest tokenized treasury issuer and a category-defining brand in the RWA stack.

    Performs in RWA-narrative phases and high-rate regimes. Underperforms in pure-crypto altcoin cycles and if rate cuts compress treasury yields.

    regulatory uncertaintyrate-cycle sensitivity
  • MANTRA12%Infrastructure

    Mantra is the Cosmos-based RWA-native L1 with regulated issuance partnerships in the UAE and Asia.

    Performs in RWA-narrative phases. Drawdown profile is sharp because the float is concentrated and the listing history is short.

    sub-2y historyconcentrated supply
  • SKY8%Yield

    Sky (formerly MakerDAO) operates the USDS and DAI stablecoin franchises and routes meaningful collateral into RWA strategies.

    Performs in RWA-narrative and high-rate regimes when RWA collateral earns wide spreads. Sensitive to DAI peg incidents and stablecoin regulation.

    stablecoin regulationpeg event risk
The record

What the numbers say

Simulated on historical constituent prices. A Sharpe is only published once the measured window clears 90 days, and drawdowns keep their sign.

Backtested record
71 day window
Sharpe grade
Track too short
A grade is published once the window reaches 90 days. This one covers 71.
Total return
+15.6%
Across the full window, simulated.
Max drawdown
−19.7%
Deepest peak to trough. 6 days to recover.
Annualised volatility
61.0%
Standard deviation of daily returns, annualised.
Beta vs bitcoin
1.18
Correlation 0.57.
Effective holdings
4.21
Of 5 named. Equal weight equivalent, from the published weights.
Simulated rebalance
Quarterly
Backtest assumption, not a published cadence.
Jensen alpha
+38.5%
Excess over what beta to bitcoin alone explains.
R squared
0.32
Share of the basket's moves bitcoin explains.
Bitcoin reference · Sharpe 0.33 · max drawdown −76.6%
OCBE100 reference · Sharpe 0.34 · max drawdown −61.1%

Every figure above is simulated on historical constituent prices for a basket that has not traded. It describes how the rules would have behaved, not how they will behave. OPC5 is part of a public preview.

Loss tail
95% VaR · loss tailhistorical
1-week · 7d−12%
1-month · 30d0%

Max expected loss over the horizon · 95% confidence · historical distribution. There is a 5% chance the actual loss is larger.

Across timeframes
vs bitcoin
Simulated return for this basket over five windows, with a Sharpe and a comparison with bitcoin wherever the window is long enough to publish one.
WindowReturnSharpevs BTC
Full window+15.6%Not graded·
1 year+15.6%Not graded·
6 months+15.6%Not graded·
3 months+15.6%Not graded·
1 month+20.3%Not graded·

Returns are simulated over each window. A Sharpe is published only once that window clears 90 days, so the shorter rows read Not graded and carry no comparison with bitcoin. Short windows flatter and punish at random; read the full window first and treat the rest as texture.

Risk

What could go wrong

Priced off this basket's own weights rather than off a generic disclaimer, so every figure below can be checked against the table above.

Drawdowns of 30 to 50% are within historical range during cycle bottoms, tracking the broader crypto market. Family-standard caps and rebalancing rules apply.

Structural flags
3 on this basket
  • Top-name weightLow

    CFG is the largest position at 30%. Capped by methodology but still drives index direction.

  • Short price historyHigh

    ONDO, MANTRA, SKY have under a year of usable history. Backtest metrics carry wider error bars.

  • Pre-live statusLow

    Second Wave index. NAV is computed but the basket isn't yet open for live allocation.

If it goes wrong
effect on net asset value
3 downside scenarios for this basket, and the loss each one would put on net asset value.
ScenarioLoss on net asset value
CFG loses half its valueLargest holding, 30.0% of the basket−15.0%Mechanical
The three largest holdings fall 30%CFG, SYRUP, ONDO · 80.0% of the basket together−24.0%Mechanical
The deepest simulated fall repeatsRecorded once in the window, 6 days to recover−19.7%Recorded

The mechanical rows hold every other holding still, which is the optimistic case. This basket measured 0.57 correlation to bitcoin over its window: the holdings often move together, though less tightly than a broad crypto basket. Read the figures as a floor on the damage, never a ceiling.

Further reading

The research behind the construction

Worth a second look later

OPC5 is under methodology review, so it carries no buy action today. The weights and the cadence are still being settled, and publishing an order panel over rules that are about to change would be the wrong kind of confidence. Everything above stays on the page while the work runs: the composition, the measured record and the risk flags all move with the research.