OLTA Finance
All indices
MX8
OMX8 · Thematic

Meme Ex-Solana 8

T3Under studyS −0.35
Reference net asset value
145.30usd

Calibrated launch value from the rulebook. This basket carries no order panel today.

Family
Thematic
Risk profile
Aggressive
Holdings
8
Weighting
Liquidity adjusted
Rebalance
Weekly
Sharpe grade
−0.35
The thesis

Why this basket exists

What the construction is trying to capture, who it is built for, and how it is meant to be sized inside a wider allocation.

Eight major meme tokens excluding Solana-native names. Concentrated on EVM and Bitcoin-adjacent memes. Different correlation profile from OSMC4 because Solana memes trade on Solana ecosystem health, while these track broader meme-cycle dynamics.

  • ThematicBeta family · Aggressive risk tier
  • Rule-based, divisor-method NAV

No committee note is published for this basket yet. The text above is its catalogue description; the framing beside it is derived from the mandate and the risk tier.

How it is meant to be used
Built forTactical sleeves only. Position size proportional to conviction.
Typical sizing1 to 5% of a crypto sleeve, tactical
Weighting ruleLiquidity adjusted
Risk tierAggressive
Composition

8 holdings, drawn to scale

Each tile's area is its weight in the basket, so the picture and the table below it are the same data read two ways.

Weight by area
8 holdings
PEPE · 28% of the basketPEPE28%DOGE · 22% of the basketDOGE22%SHIB · 18% of the basketSHIB18%FLOKI · 9% of the basketFLOKI9%TURBO · 7% of the basketTURBO7%NEIRO · 6% of the basketNEIRO6%BONK · 5% of the basketBONK5%WIF · 5% of the basketWIF5%
Largest holding
PEPE 28.0%
The single name that moves net asset value most.
Top three
68.0%
Share of the basket held by its three largest names.
Effective holdings
5.53
Equal weight equivalent of 8 named positions.
Published weights
largest first
Published weights for all 8 holdings, largest first.
HoldingShareWeight
01PEPE28%
02DOGE22%
03SHIB18%
04FLOKI9%
05TURBO7%
06NEIRO6%
07BONK5%
08WIF5%
Total100%
Holdings

Why each name earned its seat

Research notes per constituent: the case for the asset, the regime that suits it, and the risk the seat carries.

  • PEPE28%Growth

    Research note pending for this holding. Its weight and its role in the mandate are published above.

  • DOGE22%Growth

    Research note pending for this holding. Its weight and its role in the mandate are published above.

  • SHIB18%Growth

    Research note pending for this holding. Its weight and its role in the mandate are published above.

  • FLOKI9%Growth

    Research note pending for this holding. Its weight and its role in the mandate are published above.

  • TURBO7%Growth

    Research note pending for this holding. Its weight and its role in the mandate are published above.

Show the remaining 3 holdings
  • NEIRO6%Growth

    Research note pending for this holding. Its weight and its role in the mandate are published above.

  • BONK5%Growth

    Research note pending for this holding. Its weight and its role in the mandate are published above.

  • WIF5%Growth

    Research note pending for this holding. Its weight and its role in the mandate are published above.

The record

What the numbers say

Simulated on historical constituent prices. A Sharpe is only published once the measured window clears 90 days, and drawdowns keep their sign.

Backtested record
617 day window
Sharpe grade
−0.35Negative
Measured over 617 days against a bitcoin reference of 0.33.
Total return
−43.3%
Across the full window, simulated.
Max drawdown
−86.3%
Deepest peak to trough. 455 days to recover.
Annualised volatility
81.3%
Standard deviation of daily returns, annualised.
Beta vs bitcoin
1.67
Correlation 0.77.
Effective holdings
5.53
Of 8 named. Equal weight equivalent, from the published weights.
Simulated rebalance
Quarterly
Backtest assumption, not a published cadence.
Jensen alpha
−42.7%
Excess over what beta to bitcoin alone explains.
R squared
0.59
Share of the basket's moves bitcoin explains.
Bitcoin reference · Sharpe 0.33 · max drawdown −76.6%
OCBE100 reference · Sharpe 0.34 · max drawdown −61.1%

Every figure above is simulated on historical constituent prices for a basket that has not traded. It describes how the rules would have behaved, not how they will behave. OMX8 is part of a public preview.

Loss tail
95% VaR · loss tailhistorical
1-week · 7d−19%
1-month · 30d−37%

Max expected loss over the horizon · 95% confidence · historical distribution. There is a 5% chance the actual loss is larger.

Across timeframes
vs bitcoin
Simulated return for this basket over five windows, with a Sharpe and a comparison with bitcoin wherever the window is long enough to publish one.
WindowReturnSharpevs BTC
Full window−43.3%−0.35−0.84
1 year−68.1%−0.92−0.09
6 months−30.9%−0.77−0.09
3 months+4.4%0.38−3.03
1 month−2.6%Not graded·

Returns are simulated over each window. A Sharpe is published only once that window clears 90 days, so the shorter rows read Not graded and carry no comparison with bitcoin. Short windows flatter and punish at random; read the full window first and treat the rest as texture.

Risk

What could go wrong

Priced off this basket's own weights rather than off a generic disclaimer, so every figure below can be checked against the table above.

Highly volatile. Expect 50% or deeper drawdowns. Position size proportional to conviction; this is a tactical sleeve, not a buy-and-hold position.

Structural flags
5 on this basket
  • Top-name weightLow

    PEPE is the largest position at 28%. Capped by methodology but still drives index direction.

  • High-beta sleeveHigh

    Meme/momentum subcategory. Expect 50%+ drawdowns. Tactical sleeve sizing only.

  • Elevated volatilityMedium

    Backtest annualised vol 81%. See the backtest panel above for the full risk numbers.

  • Deep historical drawdownHigh

    Max drawdown reached −86% in the backtest window. Size accordingly.

  • Pre-live statusLow

    Preview index. NAV is computed but the basket isn't yet open for live allocation.

If it goes wrong
effect on net asset value
4 downside scenarios for this basket, and the loss each one would put on net asset value.
ScenarioLoss on net asset value
PEPE loses half its valueLargest holding, 28.0% of the basket−14.0%Mechanical
The three largest holdings fall 30%PEPE, DOGE, SHIB · 68.0% of the basket together−20.4%Mechanical
The deepest simulated fall repeatsRecorded once in the window, 455 days to recover−86.3%Recorded
A bad month, one in twenty95% historical value at risk over 30 days−36.9%Measured

The mechanical rows hold every other holding still, which is the optimistic case. This basket measured 0.77 correlation to bitcoin over its window, so its holdings tend to fall together rather than one at a time. Read the figures as a floor on the damage, never a ceiling.

Further reading

The research behind the construction

Worth a second look later

OMX8 is under methodology review, so it carries no buy action today. The weights and the cadence are still being settled, and publishing an order panel over rules that are about to change would be the wrong kind of confidence. Everything above stays on the page while the work runs: the composition, the measured record and the risk flags all move with the research.