OLTA Finance
All indices
FO6
OFOMO6 · Curio

FOMO Tracker 6

T3Under studyS −0.26
Reference net asset value
184.50usd

Calibrated launch value from the rulebook. This basket carries no order panel today.

Family
Curio
Risk profile
Aggressive
Holdings
6
Weighting
MomentumWeighted
Rebalance
Weekly
Sharpe grade
−0.26
The thesis

Why this basket exists

What the construction is trying to capture, who it is built for, and how it is meant to be sized inside a wider allocation.

Six tokens with the most violent 30-day rallies, rebalanced weekly. Buy high, sell higher. The momentum factor in its purest form, with the corresponding drawdown profile. A trading instrument, not a holding.

  • Curio family · Aggressive risk tier
  • Rule-based, divisor-method NAV

No committee note is published for this basket yet. The text above is its catalogue description; the framing beside it is derived from the mandate and the risk tier.

How it is meant to be used
Built forTactical sleeves only. Position size proportional to conviction.
Typical sizing1 to 5% of a crypto sleeve, tactical
Weighting ruleMomentumWeighted
Risk tierAggressive
Composition

6 holdings, drawn to scale

Each tile's area is its weight in the basket, so the picture and the table below it are the same data read two ways.

Weight by area
6 holdings
TAO · 22% of the basketTAO22%RENDER · 18% of the basketRENDER18%PENDLE · 16% of the basketPENDLE16%SUI · 16% of the basketSUI16%JUP · 14% of the basketJUP14%ONDO · 14% of the basketONDO14%
Largest holding
TAO 22.0%
The single name that moves net asset value most.
Top three
56.0%
Share of the basket held by its three largest names.
Effective holdings
5.84
Equal weight equivalent of 6 named positions.
Published weights
largest first
Published weights for all 6 holdings, largest first.
HoldingShareWeight
01TAO22%
02RENDER18%
03PENDLE16%
04SUI16%
05JUP14%
06ONDO14%
Total100%
Holdings

Why each name earned its seat

Research notes per constituent: the case for the asset, the regime that suits it, and the risk the seat carries.

  • TAO22%Growth

    Research note pending for this holding. Its weight and its role in the mandate are published above.

  • RENDER18%Growth

    Research note pending for this holding. Its weight and its role in the mandate are published above.

  • PENDLE16%Yield

    Pendle is the leading yield-trading protocol in DeFi. Tokenizes future yield into principal and yield tokens so traders can express directional yield views.

    Performs in restaking and high-yield regimes. Underperforms when underlying yields compress or restaking narratives cool.

    yield-curve regime risk
  • SUI16%Growth

    Sui is the Move-language L1 spun out of the Diem project. Parallel-execution architecture targets the throughput ceiling that Solana hits during congestion.

    Higher beta than the established L1s. Outperforms during alt-L1 rotation and on technical-narrative catalysts. Drawdowns pronounced in flight-to-quality.

    sub-3y historyventure overhang
  • JUP14%Growth

    Research note pending for this holding. Its weight and its role in the mandate are published above.

  • ONDO14%Yield

    Ondo Finance is the largest tokenized treasury issuer and a category-defining brand in the RWA stack.

    Performs in RWA-narrative phases and high-rate regimes. Underperforms in pure-crypto altcoin cycles and if rate cuts compress treasury yields.

    regulatory uncertaintyrate-cycle sensitivity
The record

What the numbers say

Simulated on historical constituent prices. A Sharpe is only published once the measured window clears 90 days, and drawdowns keep their sign.

Backtested record
669 day window
Sharpe grade
−0.26Negative
Measured over 669 days against a bitcoin reference of 0.33.
Total return
−33.1%
Across the full window, simulated.
Max drawdown
−82.7%
Deepest peak to trough. 432 days to recover.
Annualised volatility
75.2%
Standard deviation of daily returns, annualised.
Beta vs bitcoin
1.56
Correlation 0.80.
Effective holdings
5.84
Of 6 named. Equal weight equivalent, from the published weights.
Simulated rebalance
Quarterly
Backtest assumption, not a published cadence.
Jensen alpha
−22.8%
Excess over what beta to bitcoin alone explains.
R squared
0.64
Share of the basket's moves bitcoin explains.
Bitcoin reference · Sharpe 0.33 · max drawdown −76.6%
OCBE100 reference · Sharpe 0.34 · max drawdown −61.1%

Every figure above is simulated on historical constituent prices for a basket that has not traded. It describes how the rules would have behaved, not how they will behave. OFOMO6 is part of a public preview.

Loss tail
95% VaR · loss tailhistorical
1-week · 7d−18%
1-month · 30d−33%

Max expected loss over the horizon · 95% confidence · historical distribution. There is a 5% chance the actual loss is larger.

Across timeframes
vs bitcoin
Simulated return for this basket over five windows, with a Sharpe and a comparison with bitcoin wherever the window is long enough to publish one.
WindowReturnSharpevs BTC
Full window−33.1%−0.26−0.45
1 year−51.0%−0.73+0.10
6 months−9.4%−0.28+0.41
3 months+59.0%9.87+6.46
1 month+25.3%Not graded·

Returns are simulated over each window. A Sharpe is published only once that window clears 90 days, so the shorter rows read Not graded and carry no comparison with bitcoin. Short windows flatter and punish at random; read the full window first and treat the rest as texture.

Risk

What could go wrong

Priced off this basket's own weights rather than off a generic disclaimer, so every figure below can be checked against the table above.

Highly volatile. Expect 50% or deeper drawdowns. Position size proportional to conviction; this is a tactical sleeve, not a buy-and-hold position.

Structural flags
6 on this basket
  • Top-name weightLow

    TAO is the largest position at 22%. Capped by methodology but still drives index direction.

  • Short price historyHigh

    TAO, ONDO, PENDLE and 1 more have under a year of usable history. Backtest metrics carry wider error bars.

  • Editorial sleeveHigh

    Curio family. Lab-corner index: preview only, not sized for institutional mandates.

  • Elevated volatilityMedium

    Backtest annualised vol 75%. See the backtest panel above for the full risk numbers.

  • Deep historical drawdownHigh

    Max drawdown reached −83% in the backtest window. Size accordingly.

  • Pre-live statusLow

    Preview index. NAV is computed but the basket isn't yet open for live allocation.

If it goes wrong
effect on net asset value
4 downside scenarios for this basket, and the loss each one would put on net asset value.
ScenarioLoss on net asset value
TAO loses half its valueLargest holding, 22.0% of the basket−11.0%Mechanical
The three largest holdings fall 30%TAO, RENDER, PENDLE · 56.0% of the basket together−16.8%Mechanical
The deepest simulated fall repeatsRecorded once in the window, 432 days to recover−82.7%Recorded
A bad month, one in twenty95% historical value at risk over 30 days−32.5%Measured

The mechanical rows hold every other holding still, which is the optimistic case. This basket measured 0.80 correlation to bitcoin over its window, so its holdings tend to fall together rather than one at a time. Read the figures as a floor on the damage, never a ceiling.

Further reading

The research behind the construction

Worth a second look later

OFOMO6 is under methodology review, so it carries no buy action today. The weights and the cadence are still being settled, and publishing an order panel over rules that are about to change would be the wrong kind of confidence. Everything above stays on the page while the work runs: the composition, the measured record and the risk flags all move with the research.